<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>WindowsWiki</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.windowswiki.info/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.windowswiki.info</link>
	<description>Nobody will ever need more than 640 kB RAM.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:01:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>A little story about feature build labs</title>
		<link>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/05/18/a-little-story-about-feature-build-labs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/05/18/a-little-story-about-feature-build-labs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 12:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows-related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fbl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature build lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forward integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reverse integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ri]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vbl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[virtual build lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[winmain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowswiki.info/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[After the reset of Longhorn, which became Windows Vista, Microsoft introduced virtual build labs (vbl) which were replaced by feature build labs (fbl) in Windows 7. Every team working on Windows has its own feature build lab (e.g. fbl_shell, fbl_multimedia, fbl_powershell, fbl_wdk, fbl_tools, fbl_dev, etc. &#8212; there are plenty of fbl&#8217;s). The fbl&#8217;s (feature build labs) are unstable development branches [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the reset of Longhorn, which became Windows Vista, Microsoft introduced virtual build labs (vbl) which were replaced by feature build labs (fbl) in Windows 7. Every team working on Windows has its own feature build lab (e.g. fbl_shell, fbl_multimedia, fbl_powershell, fbl_wdk, fbl_tools, fbl_dev, etc. &#8212; there are plenty of fbl&#8217;s).</p>
<p>The fbl&#8217;s (feature build labs) are unstable development branches which contain the code that is under construction, whereas the winamin branch contains completed functionality that has passed integration tests. Since the winmain branch must contain code that has passed integration tests, it is (or should) be always ready for a release.</p>
<p>Basically there are two processes between winmain and fbl branches. One of them is called <strong>Forward Integration</strong> (FI) and the other is called <strong>Reverse Integration</strong> (RI). In the following I will try to illustrate and describe both processes.</p>
<h2>Reverse Integration</h2>
<p>When a new functionality in a fbl branch is completed and can pass integration tests, the code gets promoted from that fbl branch to the winmain branch. This process is referred to as reverse integration. A fbl branch can be reverse integrated to the winmain branch only after unit tests have verified the stability of the fbl branch.<br />
<a href="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/reverse_integration.png"><img src="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/reverse_integration.png" alt="" title="reverse integration" width="600" height="275" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-245" /></a></p>
<h2>Forward Integration</h2>
<p>If code from the winmain branch gets merged to a fbl branch, the process is referred to as forward integration. Since the fbl branches constantly evolve, forward integration is very important because the winmain branch integrates changes from all development branches. Ususally forward integration occurs as soon as any development (fbl) branch integrates into the winmain branch. The code from the winmain branch gets froward integrated into all development branches then. Becase the winmain branch is kept stable, forward integration to the feature build labs is safe.<br />
<a href="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/forward_integration.png"><img src="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/forward_integration.png" alt="" title="forward integration" width="600" height="269" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-244" /></a></p>
<h2>&#8220;Branching-Off&#8221;</h2>
<p>&#8220;Branching-Off&#8221; is very similar to forward integration. When the Windows codebase is ready for a release (e.g. Public Beta, RC, RTM), a branch from the winmain branch gets created (e.g. winmain_win7beta, winmian_win7rtm). Usually these branches are not reverse integrated back into the winmian branch.</p>
<p>Hotfixes are also special branches are also branched off the winmain branch. Different from  special release branches, Hotfixes are reverse intehrated into winmain.<br />
<a href="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/branching-off.png"><img src="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/branching-off.png" alt="" title="branching-off" width="600" height="269" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-243" /></a></p>
<p>Please let me hear your comments, corrections and other interesting things =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/05/18/a-little-story-about-feature-build-labs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Metro Icon Pack &#8212; Windows Phone 7 icons</title>
		<link>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/03/29/metro-icon-pack-windows-phone-7-icons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/03/29/metro-icon-pack-windows-phone-7-icons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows-related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[7]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[icons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowswiki.info/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a package containing 130 icons from Metro, the interface of Windows Phone 7 series. A preview of Windows Phone 7 has been shown at the Mobile World Congress 2010 in Barcelona; it is not 100% sure whether these icons will appear in the final version of Windows Phone 7, but probably they will. You are free to use [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://metro.windowswiki.info/" target="_blank"><img src="http://metro.windowswiki.info/metro.preview.png" alt="metro icons" /></a></p>
<p>This is a package containing 130 icons from <em>Metro</em>, the interface of Windows Phone 7 series. A preview of Windows Phone 7 has been shown at the Mobile World Congress 2010 in Barcelona; it is not 100% sure whether these icons will appear in the final version of Windows Phone 7, but probably they will.</p>
<p>You are free to use and modify these icons for your website, your applications or whatever else you want.</p>
<h1>Download at: <a href="http://metro.windowswiki.info/" target="_blank">metro.windowswiki.info</a></h1>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/03/29/metro-icon-pack-windows-phone-7-icons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A couple of Microsoft terms and acronyms explained.</title>
		<link>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/02/17/a-couple-of-microsoft-terms-and-acronyms-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/02/17/a-couple-of-microsoft-terms-and-acronyms-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:34:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows-related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Acronym]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[term]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowswiki.info/?p=159</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here is a list with some common terms and acronyms used for pre-release builds of Windows, Updates or which are used during the development process of software. BBT Binary Profile Feedback Optimization framework (Basic Block Tools (BBT)): BBT is a suite of optimization tools designed to help reduce the working-set requirements for a Win32 application by applying advanced static analysis [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a list with some common terms and acronyms used for pre-release builds of Windows, Updates or which are used during the development process of software.</p>
<table>
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>BBT</td>
<td>Binary Profile Feedback Optimization framework (Basic Block Tools (BBT)): BBT is a suite of optimization tools designed to help reduce the working-set requirements for a Win32 application by applying advanced static analysis and code layout heuristics, and integrating profile data gathered from monitoring the program execution flow. In addition, BBT rearranges static data and resources sections for additional paging reduction. Another meaning for BBT is &#8220;Black Box Testing&#8221;.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>BVT</td>
<td>Build Verification Test (often called smoke tests): A very small set of tests that check whether the app itself is worth even looking at. BVTs for Notepad would be something like &#8220;Launch, type a sentence, save, close&#8221;. A quote from a MS developer: If BVTs fail you don&#8217;t even want to sync your enlistment because things are so badly hosed just grabbing that version of the source might format your hard drive. The content of these tests is tightly controlled and doesn&#8217;t change very often.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CPP</td>
<td>Customer Preview Program</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>CTP</td>
<td>Community Technology Preview (first used for Vista build 5219 (Jan 05 CTP))</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>DNSRV</td>
<td>.NET (DotNet) Server (early name for Windows Server 2003)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>EBS</td>
<td>Essential Business Server</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>EDW*</td>
<td>External Developer Workstation*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Escrow*</td>
<td>Builds which become milestones (usually RC or RTM), because they don&#8217;t have any serious bugs (&#8220;showstoppers&#8221;).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Exit Criteria</td>
<td>A set of tests that check whether important aspects of a particular feature work correctly. These are defined by the feature team and should be recorded in the spec. The name reflects their meaning: they must be passing completely in order to exit the milestone. Exit criteria for a program like Microsoft Paint would likely include tests that each of the tools in the toolbox function correctly in a few of the most common scenarios. These tests are completely under the control of the feature team.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FBL</td>
<td>Feature build lab, used during the development of Windows 7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>FVT</td>
<td>Feature Verification Tests: Per-feature BVTs. A small set of tests that check whether a specific feature is worth even looking at. A program like Microsoft Visio might have separate FVTs for loading/saving, drawing and editing shapes, printing, and so on. FVTs are generally under the control of the feature team.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GA</td>
<td>General Availability: Describes the point where all necessary commercialization activities have been completed and the software has been made available to the general market either via the web or physical media.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>GDR</td>
<td>General Distribution Release, used for Updates and Hotfixes. GDR packages contain only security and critical stability issue fixes.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>HSBS</td>
<td>Home and Small Business Server (Team)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>IDS*</td>
<td>Internal Developer Server*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>IDW*</td>
<td>Internal Developer Workstation*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>IDX*</td>
<td>Internal Developer Client/Server*</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LCTP</td>
<td>Limited Community Technology Preview (used for a few very limited, nda-only preview programs)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>LDR</td>
<td>Limited Distribution Release, used for Updates and Hotfixes. LDR packages contain &#8220;other&#8221; fixes that have not undergone as extensive testing, and resolve issues that only a fraction of the millions of Windows users might ever encounter.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>MMS</td>
<td>Mid-Market Server (early name for Essential Business Server)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>QFE</td>
<td>Quick Fix Engineering, other term for LDR.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>QHSV</td>
<td>Q Home Server (early name for Windows Home Server)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RC</td>
<td>Release Candidate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RDP</td>
<td>Rapid Deployment Program (Launch Readiness: Accelerate adoption of Microsoft technologies. Develop public references to support marketing efforts.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RTM</td>
<td>Release To Manufacturing: Used to indicate that the software has met a defined quality level and is ready for mass distribution either by electronic means or by physical media.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>RTW</td>
<td>Release To Web: Identical to RTM except that no physical media are produced, uses the Internet for distribution.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>SBS</td>
<td>Small Business Server</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Self host</td>
<td>Builds that pass all Exit Criteria tests (and thus work well enough to be demoed and dogfooded). Means a build is ready for in-depth testing.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Self test</td>
<td>Builds that pass BVTs and FVTs (and so are usable for testing). Means is testable, the devs have run their set of initial tests.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Self toast</td>
<td>Builds that fail with BVTs (that is, your computer is toast if you install them).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>Sign-off</td>
<td>Means QA (Quality Assurance) acknowledges that the feature/product can be shipped.</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>TAP</td>
<td>Technology Adoption Program (Product Readiness: Obtain deep-dive feedback, early and throughout the development cycle. Ensure new technology meets the needs of the marketplace.)</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>TP</td>
<td>Technical Preview</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>VBL</td>
<td>Virtual build lab, used during the development of Windows Vista after the &#8220;Longhorn reset&#8221;. VBLs replaced the Labs used during the development of Longhorn (and earlier NT-based versions).</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>WHS</td>
<td>Windows Home Server</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>WSSG</td>
<td>Windows Server Solutions Group</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>WSUS</td>
<td>Windows Server Update Services</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>*These acronyms/terms have been explaned here: <a href="http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/01/10/what-does-idsidw-mean-and-what-are-escrow-builds/">What does IDS/IDW mean and what are Escrow builds?</a></p>
<p>If you have any corrections or anything to add, please let me know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/02/17/a-couple-of-microsoft-terms-and-acronyms-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Server code name &#8220;Vail&#8221; / &#8220;Aurora&#8221; &#8211; What do we know so far?</title>
		<link>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/02/03/windows-server-code-name-vail-aurora-what-do-we-know-so-far/</link>
		<comments>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/02/03/windows-server-code-name-vail-aurora-what-do-we-know-so-far/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 21:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows-related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Aurora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[code name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Colorado]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Home Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Business Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowswiki.info/?p=120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Windows Server code name &#8220;Vail&#8221; Windows Server code name &#8220;Vail&#8221; is the name for the upcoming version of Windows Home Server. It will be based on top of Windows Server 2008 R2 and feature a complete new server console (now called Dashboard). A preview version of &#8220;Vail&#8221; (ctp4, community technology preview 4) with the buildtag 6.1.7360.0 (hsbs_ids.091210-1540) leaked to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2>Windows Server code name &#8220;Vail&#8221;</h2>
<p>Windows Server code name &#8220;Vail&#8221; is the name for the upcoming version of Windows Home Server. It will be based on top of Windows Server 2008 R2 and feature a complete new server console (now called Dashboard). A preview version of &#8220;Vail&#8221; (ctp4, community technology preview 4) with the buildtag <em>6.1.7360.0 (hsbs_ids.091210-1540)</em> leaked to the internet in late January.<br />
For an in-depth overview of the leaked Vail build, check <a href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2010/02/02/a-look-at-windows-home-server-vail-build-7360/" target="_blank">this post by Rafael Rivera</a>.<br />
As you can see on the graphic below, private testing of Vail begun in 2009 and a public beta should be around soon. Microsoft has not announced a released date for Vail yet, but probably it should be available together with &#8220;Aurora&#8221; in the first half of 2011.</p>
<h2>Windows Server code name &#8220;Aurora&#8221;</h2>
<p>Windows Server code name &#8220;Aurora&#8221; is the name for the next version of Windows Small Business Server. Aurora will also be based on Windows Server 2008 R2. Not much is know about it yet, but there seems to be a build with the tag <em>6.1.7408.0 (hsbs_main.091216-2300)</em>. Aurora should also be available in the first half of 2011.</p>
<p><strong>Update (4. Feb, 2010):</strong> I asked the owner of the server (wanderingkiwi.com) on which I have found the first Aurora bits about a possible date of a public beta and got this answer:</p>
<blockquote><p>Unfortunately  you have stumbled across one of my test servers at home.  I work in Windows  Server at Microsoft. I wish I could tell you more, but at this time we are not ready to discuss future products but will certainly let you know as soon as more details become available.</p></blockquote>
<p>Here is another answer I got from a Microsoft employee regarding Aurora:</p>
<blockquote><p>We are not ready to discuss future products, but will certainly let you know as soon as more details become available.</p></blockquote>
<h2>Windows code name &#8220;Colorado&#8221;</h2>
<p>&#8220;Colorado&#8221; is the code name of the new Client Computer Connector of Vail and Aurora. Since both, WHS and SBS are developed by the same team now (hence the hsbs in the build tag, hsbs stands for <em>Windows Home and Small Business Server Team</em>) the Client Connector is the same (also the remote interface of both looks pretty much the same at this point).</p>
<p><strong>Update 2 (10 Feb. 2010):</strong> Recently a new version of the Client Computer Connector leaked (build tag is <em>6.1.7447.0 (hsbs_main.100207-2200)</em>). It does not show the &#8220;Colorado&#8221; in system properties anymore.</p>
<p><strong>Update 3 (17 Feb. 2010):</strong> A few more Client Computer Connectors leaked. Here is a list of all currently known Vail/Aurora builds:</p>
<p><em>6.1.1224.0 (wssg_common.090723-0400)<br />
6.1.1308.0<br />
6.1.1326.0 (wssg_common.091105-0400)<br />
6.1.1329.0 (wssg_common.091110-0400)<br />
6.1.1335.0<br />
6.1.1336.0 (wssg_common.091119-0400)<br />
6.1.1340.0 (wssg_common.091125-1800)<br />
6.1.1345.0 (wssg_common.091203-0400)<br />
6.1.1346.0 (wssg_common.091204-0400)</em><br />
6.1.7360.0 (hsbs_ids.091210-1540)<br />
6.1.7408.0 (hsbs_main.091216-2300)<br />
6.1.7434.0 (hsbs_main.100125-2200)<br />
6.1.7444.0 (hsbs_main.100204-2200)<br />
6.1.7447.0 (hsbs_main.100207-2200)<br />
6.1.7451.0 (hsbs_main.100211-2200)</p>
<p>(those in italic have been found in the leaked Vail CTP, it&#8217;s not clear whether these are Vail builds or not)</p>
<div id="attachment_132" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/vail_aurora.png"><img class="size-large wp-image-132" title="&quot;Vail&quot; / &quot;Aurora&quot; Roadmap" src="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/vail_aurora-1024x297.png" alt="" width="600" height="174" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Windows Home Server / Small Business Server Support Lifecycle</p></div>
<div id="attachment_134" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 610px"><a href="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/var.png"><img class="size-large wp-image-134" title="&quot;Vail&quot; / &quot;Aurora&quot; Roadmap" src="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/var-1024x398.png" alt="" width="600" height="233" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Windows Product Roadmap</p></div>
<p>Finally, here are some wallpapers I made:</p>
<div id="attachment_140" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/aurora.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-140 " title="Windows Server code name &quot;Aurora&quot; wallpaper" src="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/aurora-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">&quot;Aurora&quot; wallpaper</p></div>
<div id="attachment_142" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/vail2.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-142 " title="Windows Server code name &quot;Vail&quot; wallpaper" src="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/vail2-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">&quot;Vail&quot; wallpaper</p></div>
<div id="attachment_141" class="wp-caption alignleft" style="width: 160px"><a href="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/vail1.png"><img class="size-thumbnail wp-image-141 " title="Windows Server code name &quot;Aurora&quot; / &quot;Vail&quot; bliss" src="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/vail1-150x150.png" alt="" width="150" height="150" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">&quot;Aurora&quot; / &quot;Vail&quot; bliss</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/02/03/windows-server-code-name-vail-aurora-what-do-we-know-so-far/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does IDS/IDW mean and what are Escrow builds?</title>
		<link>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/01/10/what-does-idsidw-mean-and-what-are-escrow-builds/</link>
		<comments>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/01/10/what-does-idsidw-mean-and-what-are-escrow-builds/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows-related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[build]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EDW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Escrow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[External]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDW]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IDX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Server]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workstation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowswiki.info/new/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have noticed a lot of questions and confusion regarding IDS builds recently. In the following I&#8217;ll give you a small overview of the different developer builds and what their abbrevations mean. There are 3 kinds of these developer builds, which are: IDW &#8211; Internal Developer Workstation IDS &#8211; Internal Developer Server Originally the IDS term was used to describe [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have noticed a lot of questions and confusion regarding IDS builds recently. In the following I&#8217;ll give you a small overview of the different developer builds and what their abbrevations mean.</p>
<p>There are 3 kinds of these developer builds, which are:</p>
<h2>IDW &#8211; Internal Developer Workstation<br />
IDS &#8211; Internal Developer Server</h2>
<p>Originally the IDS term was used to describe a build which can be used as a server and the IDW term was used for a build which can be used as a workstation inside Microsoft &#8220;without too much pain&#8221;. Later, this connotation has changed and these builds have been seperated into two &#8220;tiers&#8221;: IDW for unstable builds and IDS for builds which are a bit more stable than IDW builds, but not as stable as beta builds. IDS builds did not have to be a Server SKU anymore (and vice versa).<br />
Today, the term IDW is used for CTPs and stuff like this and the term IDS is used to describe unstable builds, or builds of a &#8220;helper-branch&#8221; (for example winmain_win7ids).<br />
The term IDX (Internal Developer Client/Server) is used to avoid confusion between IDS and IDW.</p>
<p>Here is a quote a guy from the WSSG (Windows Server Solutions Group) made once:</p>
<blockquote><p>This milestone is termed the &#8220;Internal Developer Server&#8221; (IDS) build &#8211; it&#8217;s<br />
an internal quality term we use meaning that the build is stable enough to<br />
deploy and evaluate, but may contain more minor bugs than a Beta build.<br />
You&#8217;ll run into some unedited UI stings, and some bugs that we purposefully<br />
chose not to fix until later in the development cycle. It&#8217;s a tradeoff we&#8217;ve<br />
made to ensure we keep getting great feedback without unduly delaying the<br />
project.</p></blockquote>
<h2>EDW &#8211; External Developer Workstation</h2>
<p>This term was used during the final development of Windows Vista (between RC and RTM) for builds which got released to the TAPs. I am not sure if this term has been used for anything else, but I think you can compare this with the IDX builds of Windows 7 (which represent something like an inofficial/internal Release Candidate).</p>
<p>Let me know if you have any anything to add.</p>
<h1>What are Escrow builds?</h1>
<h3>(Update from 10. Jan, 2010)</h3>
<p>Sometimes Microsoft released builds referred to as &#8220;Escrow&#8221;. Escrow means the development of a branch gets stopped and the code is being tested. If Microsoft or its testers don&#8217;t discover any serious bugs (&#8220;showstoppers&#8221;), the current build becomes the final milestone (usually RC or RTM, but sometimes there are also beta escrow builds). Escrow builds are usually handed out to TAP (Technology Adoption Program) testers, ISVs, IHVs, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.windowswiki.info/2010/01/10/what-does-idsidw-mean-and-what-are-escrow-builds/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You want to create a custom OS? Don&#8217;t do it!</title>
		<link>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/08/04/you-want-to-create-a-custom-os-dont-do-it/</link>
		<comments>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/08/04/you-want-to-create-a-custom-os-dont-do-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 22:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows-related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Codename Sylvester]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Custom OS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hackjob]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wasted time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowswiki.info/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than one and a half year ago I have been working on a project &#8212; I used to call these kind of hackjobs &#8220;Custom OS&#8221;, but that term doesn&#8217;t fit very well if you ask me &#8212; called Codename Sylvester. A few days ago I stumbled over a 3GB zip file containing all the work related to this project [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than one and a half year ago I have been working on a project &#8212; I used to call these kind of hackjobs &#8220;Custom OS&#8221;, but that term doesn&#8217;t fit very well if you ask me &#8212; called <em>Codename Sylvester</em>.</p>
<p>A few days ago I stumbled over a 3GB zip file containing all the work related to this project but unfortunately the archive was damaged. For amusement&#8217;s sake I tried to recover as much files as possible and managed it to get most of them back, so I installed the latest build of Codename Sylvester I found.</p>
<p>Most likely you have seen some of these hacked (and in most of the cases pirated) Windows XP versions called something like &#8220;Windows XP Dark Edition&#8221; or &#8220;Windows XP Ultimate Gamers Edition&#8221; or whatever. When I was working on Sylvester I didn&#8217;t had the feeling that I am creating something like this. My goal was to create a light-weight, fast, stable and good-looking version of Windows XP which not only I would use, but also other people.</p>
<p>After installing it I was a little bit impressed, because parts of it looked very well (re-styled setup routine, OOBE, logon UI, etc.), but this impression didn&#8217;t last very long. All I have done are some hackjobs on various resource files and executeables and slimming down the ISO, but actually I didn&#8217;t accomplish any of the goals I had for this project expect the visuals (which are incomplete too).</p>
<p>Why am I writing this? Well, there are so many projects similar to Sylvester and I came to the conclusion that they are useless. Actually noone will ever use bullshit like that. They don&#8217;t work very well with Windows Update (reshacked dlls get replaced and things are broken then), often they are slow and bloated and of course, they are illegal. I have been working on Sylvester for about two months back then and I must admit, this was wasted time.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t waste your time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/08/04/you-want-to-create-a-custom-os-dont-do-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A few batch files for creating Windows 7 setup images</title>
		<link>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/06/21/a-few-batch-files-for-creating-windows-7-setup-images/</link>
		<comments>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/06/21/a-few-batch-files-for-creating-windows-7-setup-images/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 17:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows-related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CREATEISO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VHD2WIM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WIM2VHD]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowswiki.info/new/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the recent leaks of Windows 7 there have been several builds which did not come on an ISO file, but have been leaked as a VHD file or an archive instead. I have created a few batch files which make it easy to convert a VHD image to an ISO file and to recreate authentic setup discs of Windows [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the recent leaks of Windows 7 there have been several builds which did not come on an ISO file, but have been leaked as a VHD file or an archive instead. I have created a few batch files which make it easy to convert a VHD image to an ISO file and to recreate authentic setup discs of Windows 7.</p>
<ul>
<li>
<h2>WIM2VHD</h2>
<p>This batch file converts WIM files to VHD files; you can create VHD images identical to those which have been leaked by Wzor recently with that batch file.</p>
<h3><a href='http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/WIM2VHD.zip'>Download WIM2VHD</a></h3>
</li>
<li>
<h2>VHD2WIM</h2>
<p>This batch file does exactly the opposite as the first one. If you have a VHD image, it creates a WIM image for you, which you can put on an ISO file to install it.</p>
<h3><a href='http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/VHD2WIM.zip'>Download VHD2WIM</a></h3>
</li>
<li>
<h2>CREATEISO</h2>
<p>This batch file allows you to create an authentic ISO image, if you only have the setup files of a build (for example the 7022 and the 7048 leak).</p>
<h3><a href='http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/CREATEISO.zip'>Download CREATEISO</a></h3>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Update (16 Apr. 2010):</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>
<h2>Disk2vhd</h2>
<p>by Mark Russinovich and Bryce Cogswell</p>
<blockquote><p>Disk2vhd is a utility that creates VHD (Virtual Hard Disk &#8211; Microsoft&#8217;s Virtual Machine disk format) versions of physical disks for use in Microsoft Virtual PC or Microsoft Hyper-V virtual machines (VMs). The difference between Disk2vhd and other physical-to-virtual tools is that you can run Disk2vhd on a system that’s online. Disk2vhd uses Windows&#8217; Volume Snapshot capability, introduced in Windows XP, to create consistent point-in-time snapshots of the volumes you want to include in a conversion. You can even have Disk2vhd create the VHDs on local volumes, even ones being converted (though performance is better when the VHD is on a disk different than ones being converted).</p></blockquote>
<h3><a href="http://technet.microsoft.com/sysinternals/ee656415.aspx" target="_blank">Download Disk2vhd @ www.sysinternals.com</a></h3>
</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/06/21/a-few-batch-files-for-creating-windows-7-setup-images/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Visual Studio / .NET build numbers explained</title>
		<link>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/06/07/visual-studio-net-build-numbers-explained/</link>
		<comments>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/06/07/visual-studio-net-build-numbers-explained/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 06:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows-related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.NET]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[build number]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Visual Studio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YMMDD.NN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowswiki.info/new/?p=38</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you have been wondering why the build numbers of Visual Studio and .NET are always so high, for example 10.0.20506.01 for the recent Visual Studio 2010 beta. The reason for this is the format of the build number &#8212; it&#8217;s not an incrementing number as for Windows builds &#8212; the format of Visual Studio build numbers is YMMDD.NN. Y: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you have been wondering why the build numbers of Visual Studio and .NET are always so high, for example 10.0.20506.01 for the recent Visual Studio 2010 beta. The reason for this is the format of the build number &#8212; it&#8217;s not an incrementing number as for Windows builds &#8212; the format of Visual Studio build numbers is <strong>YMMDD.NN</strong>.</p>
<p><strong>Y</strong>: This increases every year the team is working on the product<br />
<strong>MM</strong>: The month in which the build was compiled<br />
<strong>DD</strong>: The day on which the build was compiled<br />
<strong>NN</strong>: Number of recompiles of the build (during the development this number is mostly 00 or 01, but when a build gets branched for release, the other parts of the build number are freezed and only this part increments)</p>
<p>This build number format is not only used for Visual Studio and .NET, but also for many other products like Commerce Server 2009, Codename Geneva ir Microsoft Silverlight.</p>
<p>Here are a few examples:</p>
<p>8.0.40607.16 &#8211; VS 2005 Beta 1 &#8211; 2004*, 7th June, recompile no. 16<br />
8.0.50215.44 &#8211; VS 2005 Beta 2 &#8211; 2005, 15 February, recompile no. 44<br />
8.0.50727.26 &#8211; VS 2005 RC &#8211; 2005, 27th July, recompile no. 26<br />
8.0.50727.42 &#8211; VS 2005 RTM</p>
<p>9.0.20404.00 &#8211; VS 2008 Beta 1<br />
9.0.20706.01 &#8211; VS 2008 Beta 2<br />
9.0.21022.08 &#8211; VS 2008 RTM</p>
<p>10.0.11001.01 &#8211; VS 2010 CTP<br />
10.0.20506.01 &#8211; VS 2010 Beta 1</p>
<p>*Orginally the Y was the last character of the calendar year, but with the beginning of the development of Visual Studio 2008 it has been changed to the number of the year the team is working on the project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/06/07/visual-studio-net-build-numbers-explained/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Parser</title>
		<link>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/04/27/parser/</link>
		<comments>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/04/27/parser/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 23:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Parser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DOS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[floppy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[image]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Setup information file]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowswiki.info/new/?p=4</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe you have seen one of these old Microsoft DOS and Windows 3.x setup information files (usually named setup.inf) already. Most of the software back then was distributed on floppy disks and the setup.inf has been used to advise the setup program which file is located on which floppy disk. Many of the old operating systems available at MSDN or [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe you have seen one of these old Microsoft DOS and Windows 3.x setup information files (usually named <em>setup.inf</em>) already. Most of the software back then was distributed on floppy disks and the setup.inf has been used to advise the setup program which file is located on which floppy disk.<br />
Many of the old operating systems available at MSDN or other places do not come on floppy disk images &#8212; all the setup files are just put into one archive or folder instead &#8212; which makes it very hard to recreate the setup floppys, because you would have to check the setup.inf for every file and sort them by hand which is a lot of work for 500+ files.</p>
<p>This is where <strong>Parser</strong> comes into play: It reads the setup information file and sorts the files for you.</p>
<h2>How does it work?</h2>
<p>Microsofts setup information files usually look like this (excerpt):</p>
<blockquote><p>tutor     = &#8220;wintutor.exe &#8221;<br />
NetSetup  = FALSE<br />
MouseDrv  = TRUE<br />
Version   = &#8220;3.1.040&#8243;</p>
<p>; This is data needed by the MS-DOS half of setup so that it can copy the<br />
; proper kernel and start Windows for the GUI portion of setup.<br />
;<br />
; ** MS-DOS documentation says that first byte of command line for 4a call<br />
; ** should be space. ==&gt; in execcmd RHS leave first space as it is now<br />
[winexec]<br />
execstd   = &#8220;dosx.exe &#8221;<br />
execcmd   = &#8221; krnl286.exe /b /q:&#8221;<br />
exechimem = &#8220;xmsmmgr.exe&#8221;<br />
himemcmd  = &#8220;&#8221;<br />
Krnl386   = 2:krnl386.exe<br />
Krnl286   = 2:krnl286.exe<br />
dosx      = 2:dosx.exe</p>
<p>; Names of the disks Setup can prompt for.<br />
[disks]<br />
1 =. ,&#8221;Microsoft Windows 3.1 disk #1&#8243;,disk1<br />
2 =. ,&#8221;Microsoft Windows 3.1 disk #2&#8243;,disk2<br />
3 =. ,&#8221;Microsoft Windows 3.1 disk #3&#8243;,disk3<br />
4 =. ,&#8221;Microsoft Windows 3.1 disk #4&#8243;,disk4<br />
5 =. ,&#8221;Microsoft Windows 3.1 disk #5&#8243;,disk5<br />
6 =. ,&#8221;Microsoft Windows 3.1 disk #6&#8243;,disk6<br />
7 =. ,&#8221;Microsoft Windows 3.1 disk #7&#8243;,disk7<br />
8 =. ,&#8221;Microsoft Windows 3.1 disk #8&#8243;,disk8</p>
<p>[oemdisks]<br />
Z =. ,&#8221;HP DeskJet Series v2.0 disk (z krabice s tiskárnou, nebo od HP)&#8221;,diskz</p>
<p>[user]<br />
4:setup.ini, noupdate</p>
<p>[windows]<br />
1:setup.hlp<br />
1:install.com<br />
1:setup.txt<br />
1:win.src,    Net<br />
1:system.src, Net<br />
1:winhelp.exe<br />
2:control.hlp<br />
2:GLOSSARY.HLP<br />
3:WINHELP.HLP</p>
<p>[windows.system]<br />
1:gdi.exe<br />
2:user.exe<br />
1:win.cnf<br />
1:lzexpand.dll<br />
2:ver.dll</p></blockquote>
<p>Using  regular expressions, Parser looks for every line in the file with matches with that pattern <strong>N:FILENAME.EXT</strong> (N is the number of the floppy disk on which the file has to be put to).<br />
After scanning the setup.inf file, Parser creates folders for each floppy disk and moves the respective setup files into them. All you have to do after that process is putting the contents from each folder onto a disk image or floppy disk.</p>
<h1><a href="http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/PARSER_1.1.zip">PARSER 1.1</a></h1>
<h2>Version history</h2>
<p>v1.1 &#8211; 26/07/2009 &#8211; Minor bug fixes<br />
v1.0 &#8211; 27/04/2009 &#8211; Initital release of Parser</p>
<h2>Known issues</h2>
<ul>
<li><del datetime="2009-07-26T12:17:57+00:00">Parser does not support chars as floppy disk identifiers</del> <em>fixed in version 1.1</em></li>
<li>Parser does not support paths containig spaces at this point</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/04/27/parser/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to extract msu/msp/msi/exe files on the command line</title>
		<link>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/02/19/how-to-extract-msumspmsiexe-files-on-the-command-line/</link>
		<comments>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/02/19/how-to-extract-msumspmsiexe-files-on-the-command-line/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Windows-related]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[extract]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[msu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.windowswiki.info/new/?p=66</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find these commands quite helpful &#8212; maybe you know them already &#8212; if not, here you go: Microsoft Hotfix Installer (.exe) setup.exe /t:C:\extracted_files\ /c Microsoft Update Standalone Package (.msu) expand -F:* update.msu C:\extracted_files cd extracted_files expand -F:* update.cab C:\extracted_files Microsoft Patch File (.msp) msix patch.msp /out C:\extracted_files msix.zip Windows Installer Package (.msi) msiexec /a setup.msi /qb TARGETDIR=C:\extracted_files]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find these commands quite helpful &#8212; maybe you know them already &#8212; if not, here you go:</p>
<h2>Microsoft Hotfix Installer (.exe)</h2>
<p><code>setup.exe /t:C:\extracted_files\ /c</code></p>
<h2>Microsoft Update Standalone Package (.msu)</h2>
<p><code>expand -F:* update.msu C:\extracted_files<br />
cd extracted_files<br />
expand -F:* update.cab C:\extracted_files</code></p>
<h2>Microsoft Patch File (.msp)</h2>
<p><code>msix patch.msp /out C:\extracted_files</code><br />
<a href='http://www.windowswiki.info/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/msix.zip'>msix.zip</a></p>
<h2>Windows Installer Package (.msi)</h2>
<p><code>msiexec /a setup.msi /qb TARGETDIR=C:\extracted_files</code></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.windowswiki.info/2009/02/19/how-to-extract-msumspmsiexe-files-on-the-command-line/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
